Permutationes1 ♥ 1860 ♣ 48.8566 ° N, 2.3522° E ♠ (254,253,240) ♥ α ♥ Ra
Permutationes2 ♥ 960 ♥ 31.7683 ° N,35.2137° E ♣ (1,215,88) ♠ أ ♠ Au
Permutationes3 ♠ 408 ♠ 40.4637 ° N, 3.7492° W ♠ (115,8,0) ♣ א ♣ Bh
Permutationes4 ♣ 372 ♠ 33.8938 ° N, 35.5018° E ♣ (250,164,2) ♥ 見 ♥ Li
The 4 paintings in the "permutation" series form an inseparable whole.
The base of each of these paintings is formed by four elementary rectangles. These rectangles permute in a circular manner from one painting to another to form the base of the four paintings.
Each rectangle is made up of the same geometric figures (square, round, triangle) as well as a set of symbols, letters, numbers and signs whose position obeys a set order associated with a dose of chance.
Each painting is then processed to produce different compositions but from the same initial elements.
The idea of these paintings is to play with the convergence and divergence of things, thoughts, visions... which, even if they have common origins, take different forms or paths that may or may not lead to the same places.
The result is an interweaving between common things and things specific to each painting. And it becomes difficult in this tangle to isolate what is common from what is proper, as is often the case with human thought, what is innate from what is acquired, the beliefs we have today compared to the beliefs we had in the past or will have in the future.
The important thing, in my opinion, is to recognise this entanglement and thus to try to make a distinction between what we are as a result of our environment and what we are without this environment.
The base of each of these paintings is formed by four elementary rectangles. These rectangles permute in a circular manner from one painting to another to form the base of the four paintings.
Each rectangle is made up of the same geometric figures (square, round, triangle) as well as a set of symbols, letters, numbers and signs whose position obeys a set order associated with a dose of chance.
Each painting is then processed to produce different compositions but from the same initial elements.
The idea of these paintings is to play with the convergence and divergence of things, thoughts, visions... which, even if they have common origins, take different forms or paths that may or may not lead to the same places.
The result is an interweaving between common things and things specific to each painting. And it becomes difficult in this tangle to isolate what is common from what is proper, as is often the case with human thought, what is innate from what is acquired, the beliefs we have today compared to the beliefs we had in the past or will have in the future.
The important thing, in my opinion, is to recognise this entanglement and thus to try to make a distinction between what we are as a result of our environment and what we are without this environment.